Living Rivers - Colorado Riverkeeper
      Home    |    About    |    News    |    Campaigns   
Regional News
August 2, 2017

San Diego Water Authority to take legal dispute to Supreme Court

By Dana Lohr

SAN DIEGO (KUSI) — The San Diego County Water Authority announced Monday that it will take a long-running legal dispute over rates to the state Supreme Court.

The decision comes just over a month after an appellate court issued what amounted to a split decision in the Water Authority's case against the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.

The SDCWA has sued the MWD multiple times over rates, with the largest issue being how much the MWD was allowed to charge for transporting Colorado River water to San Diego. The MWD is the primary water wholesaler in the southern half of the state and owns the facilities that convey water around the region.

A San Francisco Superior Court judge has consistently ruled in favor of the San Diego water agency, which has been awarded a total of roughly $232 million. Ther MWD appealed, and among other things, the appellate justices ordered the damages to be recalculated.

The San Diego water agency contended it was not only billed for moving the water from one place to another, but also for the MWD's costs of maintaining the California Aqueduct -- a system not used for bringing the Colorado River water to San Diego.

"While components of this case appear complex, it essentially boils down to whether MWD can force San Diego County to pay for a State Water Project supply it didn't want to buy and hasn't received,' said Mark Muir, chairman of the Water Authority's Board of Directors.

"We are hopeful that the state's highest court will recognize that the Water Authority's Board of Directors did the right thing when it chose to invest billions of dollars to conserve water in Imperial County, rather than continue its heavy reliance on imported water supplies purchased from MWD, a substantial portion of which MWD obtains from the Bay-Delta,' Muir said. "We also hope the Supreme Court will grant review in order to preserve bedrock limits on the power of government to impose fees and charges on ordinary Californians.'

Lawyer Neal Katyal said the impact of the appellate court ruling will be felt statewide if not reversed by the high court.

MWD officials contend the Water Authority is trying to shift its cost onto ratepayers elsewhere in the state.

The Supreme Court justices have about two months to decide whether to accept the case. If they do, it could take 18 months to two years before a final decision is issued.

###

An Indian groundwater rights case is also headed for the U.S. Supreme Court

Click here to read this story in The Desert Sun by Ian James

Back | Top
Last Update: October 30, 2007

Home  |  About  |  News  |  Campaigns
Living Rivers    PO Box 466     Moab, UT 84532     435.259.1063     info@livingrivers.org